Posted by PZ Myers on June 21, 2004 05:38 PM

An aquatic sloth?


Skull of Thalassocnus yaucensis, sp. nov., holotype, MUSM 37 in lateral (A), ventral (B), dorsal (C), views; mandible in lateral left (D) and dorsal (E) views.

Carl Zimmer has the details. This is very cool—yet another series of transitional fossils, showing a set of Peruvian sloths, of all things, that adapted to an aquatic lifestyle over the course of several million years.

Trackback URL: http://www.pandasthumb.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/287

Comment #4049

Posted by Reed A. Cartwright on June 22, 2004 12:47 AM (e) (s)

PZ,

What paper is that figure from?

Comment #4054

Posted by PZ Myers on June 22, 2004 08:03 AM (e) (s)

That figure is from:

De Muizon C, McDonald G, Salas R, Urbina M (2004) The youngest species of the aquatic sloth <i>Thalassocnus</i> and a reassessment of the relationships of the nothrothere sloths (Mammalia: Xenartha). J Vert Paleo 24(2)387-397.

Comment #4063

Posted by T. Russ on June 22, 2004 10:19 AM (e) (s)

Are there any disputes or disagreements about this fossil in the literature? Do all paleontologist consider this fella to be clearly transitional?

Comment #4124

Posted by T. Russ on June 23, 2004 11:08 AM (e) (s)

Hello?

Post a Comment

Use Kwickcode Formatting to markup your comments. You may need to refresh before you will see your comment.




Remember personal info?

  


Trackback: Taking the Plunge

Posted by The Loom on June 21, 2004 06:18 PM

We like to think of boundaries as being clear-cut borders, but at least in the biological world they generally turn out to be fuzzy zones of change. The line between land and sea is my own favorite example. Last summer...