Propaganda of the Day from the Discovery [sic] Institute


Today the DI Media Complaints Division is complaining about being misrepresented about its position on ID in public education. The post goes on at some length, but here is a representative declaration:

Rob Crowther, Discovery Institute Wrote:

They [some conservative intellectuals quoted in the Weekly Standard] are cited as being critical of “some” IDers who are trying to shoehorn ID into science curriculum. We completely agree with their underlying concern. At the risk of sounding like a broken record: Discovery Institute has never advocated the mandating of the theory of intelligent design in public school science curriculum.

Unfortunately, this is about as credible as the cdesign proponentsists’ claim that ID isn’t creationism. For example, almost all of the authors of Of Pandas and People, a book aimed at public school ninth grade biology students and originally pushed for statewide adoption in Alabama and Texas, are current DI fellows, and chunks of the book are posted all over the DI website. I suppose Crowther could exclude these facts on the basis that Pandas was written before the DI got into ID. But we also have the Wedge Document. It is fun to search on words like “teach” and “curricula”. For example:

Phase III. Once our research and writing have had time to mature, and the public prepared for the reception of design theory, we will move toward direct confrontation with the advocates of materialist science through challenge conferences in significant academic settings. We will also pursue possible legal assistance in response to resistance to the integration of design theory into public school science curricula

FIVE YEAR OBJECTIVES […] 6. Ten states begin to rectify ideological imbalance in their science curricula & include design theory

How could anyone possibly get confused about the DI’s position?


I’m always wavering between Disco Institute (the superficial glitter covering up the utter lack of substance) and Deception Institute (deadly accurate, but a tad on the dry side)–neither of which is original with me (hey, how can a pinhead be expected to generate new information?).

But–speaking of information–Disinformation Institute does jave a real ring to it, as well.

It’s just getting ridiculous. These idiots make me [sic]

“jave”? “have”? Why sweat the details; the DI never does.

Your methodology used to determine the DI’s stance on the issue is hopelessy lost within materialist dogma.

Is it possible they’ve changed their position?

If you toss in a little Mao then you can get materialist running dogma.

Is it possible they’ve changed their position?


OK, I’ll bite.

Why, oh seeker, would they change their position, eh?

Interesting name alternatives for the DI. Unfortunately, no such easy spoofs of Panda’s Thumb come to mind… The Panderer’s Thumb? The Pandemic Thumb? The Panda’s Dumb? The Pandering Dumb?



drugseeking won’t increase your intelligence quotient sufficiently to repair that lame attempt.

but, after you get that coffee, care to address the question i posed to you?

I’m betting your answer will be far more humorous.

Is it possible they’ve changed their position?

It’d be irrelevant even if they have. Their original statement was:

Discovery Institute has never advocated the mandating of the theory of intelligent design in public school science curriculum.

Note that verb tense: has never. Demonstrably false.

Alles klar?

That they should lie about that does not make me feel confident that they’ve ‘changed their position’.

Lying kinda does that ya know, makes it so people don’t wanna believe you…

Organizations change, mature - the page from which the copy above was taken, has it been replaced by different copy? Have they admitted to changing their position, or are they denying that they ever had the previous position?

If they say they’ve changed, maybe you should consider that. I mean, Planned Parenthood says they’ve abandoned the eugenic, racist ideas of Sanger - should I also disbelieve them? Or should I be suspicious.

Sure, that was further in the past, and there are different people at the helm now. But I’m just asking - is it possible that they’ve changed their means and their ends, for either practical or ideological reasons?

Or can we just assume a conspiracy because we don’t like them?

Re: this dogma thing.

Whose Ma exactly are you calling a “dog”?

Sure, that was further in the past, and there are different people at the helm now

then answer your own dumb question.

Are the same people at the helm of the DI now as when the wedge document was created?


maybe you better drink more coffee.

and yes, we remember you.

If they say they’ve changed, maybe you should consider that. I mean, Planned Parenthood says they’ve abandoned the eugenic, racist ideas of Sanger - should I also disbelieve them? Or should I be suspicious.

Nice try. To repeat: “HAS NEVER”. Means that at no time did they do it. That was their claim.

But we know they did advocate it. So even if they have changed their position, the statement is still false.

Two possibilities: either they’re too lazy to look up their old position papers, or they’re lying. Given how legendary the Wedge Document is, I think the latter is more likely. Pointing out someone’s falsehood is not a ‘conspiracy’. Aren’t you christian types supposed to oppose dishonesty?

BTW, nice swipe at Planned Parenthood. Classy.


“If they say they’ve changed, maybe you should consider that.”

Here is a useful link for you.

Well, it looks like they are lying about “never.”

seeker, is there proof Planned Parenthood ever espoused those ideas? Sanger is the founder, but (as we heard many times through the Dover trial) does the personal philosophy of a person necessarily taint their work or objectives?

But let’s say I grant you that you can prove at some point Planned Parenthood espoused “the eugenic, racist ideas of Sanger”. If you can prove that, and then the current-day Planned Parenthood said, “We have never espoused those ideas”, they would be liars, whether or not their position had changed.

The statement highlighted in the original post is a lie. It’s provably false. Whether or not DI has changed its position over time, it has just now released a fabrication.

Hey, Planned Parenthood is worthy of the abuse. They’re a favorite whipping boy, just like ID ;)

Damn, your admission totally deflates the impact of my post. Nevertheless, glad you have “seen the light”, so to speak.

Well, it looks like they are lying about “never.”

Nice, this is progress. Unexpected, but progress nonetheless.

how can you ride that bike so fast backwards, seeker?

Nah, planned parenthood has much worse things to criticize than the spectre of Margaret Sanger. But that’s not what this post is about. ;)

By listening to you, toejam, by listening to you.

Ya gotta admit, if he can backpeddle and listen at the same time, he must not be quite as dumb as he sounds…

By listening to you, toejam, by listening to you.

now if only EVERYBODY would listen to me!

plans for world domination, proceeding one person at a time.



he must not be quite as dumb as he sounds…

don’t count your chickens…

Is it possible they’ve changed their position?

Is it possible they got their ass reamed out in court, and would rather not repeat the painful experience again?

Hey Seeker, weren’t you about to explain to me how ID is different from creation “science” . … ?

Well, it looks like they are lying about “never.”

Ahhhhh, a journey of a thousand miles, begins with a single step.

Now … what ELSE have they lied about through the years?

Hey, ‘Seeker’, I have a question for you. Try and answer it honestly.

Which would you personally prefer:

(a) that the DI really has changed their position, and do not want ID taught in schools;

or (b) that their position is actually unchanged, and that they still do seek to advance the teaching of ID in schools.

I’m not asking you what you think their position is. I’m asking you, deep down, which position would you rather they had. Not their public stance, their real position.

maybe he’s a coprophagous coprophillic?

otoh, mayb he just innately realizes that the study of ID is best defined as scatology?

The obsession with excrement is a Teutonic thing. The Berkeley folklorist Alan Dundes wrote a splendid little book on scatology in German culture–Life is Like A Chicken Coop Ladder. Dundes died last year, a real loss since serious scholars with a sense of humor are thin on the ground.

oh, btw, nice job there KhaTzek. er, lots of ‘food for thought’.…

“Maybe it’s because someone brought up the topic of religion and began attacking religious people, which has something to do with religion.”

Maybe you should read the actual thread first, you dolt. Then you’d see that it was seeker who brought up the topic by claiming that atheists are less moral than religious people. Moses was challenging that assertion, and so far he’s provided a good deal more of evidence for his side than seeker has, or you.

Go fling your doo-doo somewhere else.

That “mynym” is one seriously weird dude!

Can you imagine your reaction if he (no female on the planet would write that way) expressed admiration and agreement with your own position about, well, ANYTHING?

Can you imagine your reaction if he (no female on the planet would write that way)

To identify Mynym as a male (and a white male, at that) it is only necessary to point out that he is an IDer.

If you take a look at the photos of all the prominent IDers at Discovery Institute, you will see that they are all, without exception, white males.

The same is true of ICR and AIG’s creation ‘scientists’.

Ah So.… Lenny. So they are the lost tribe of the anti-feminists who can always rely on HIM upstairs if they can just prove HE is really THERE.And who can tell those beastly fembots to make babies and keep quite.

Yo, Seeker, I notice you totally refused to address a single point I made, except to call the moral issue of slavery in America a “red herring.”

If you’re really that uninterested in slavery as a moral issue, then your “morality” is crap, and you’re in no position to preach about the moral condition of ANYONE, atheist or not.

If you really want to establish some credibility here, perhaps you can explain how lying to other people’s kids about science protects morality in the US. Perhaps you can also answer another question you have so far ignored: are Christians who accept evolution and oppose ID less “moral” in any demonstrable way than those who support ID?

Arguing only with the atheists’ most pig-ignorant talking-points won’t get you anywhere.

Comment #74614

Posted by mynym on January 22, 2006 01:19 AM (e)

More ignorance: “Lincoln would be more properly classified as a “New Age Spiritualist” more than anything else.

Clearly a moral man. Clearly not a Christian. And if it wasn’t for his new-age-like spirituality, we’d have to put him in the atheist category.”

Vs. his own words:

Silly boy, Lincoln was a politician who, in his own writings and admissions, was clear that he could never let the cat out of the bag. But the everlasting fact is that Lincoln was Deist who was definitely NOT a Christian, did not believe in Jesus, and was, in our day and time, properly classified as a new age spiritualist, if anything.

I mean, use your brain. He’s in his 20’s and writes his work. He gets ADVICE to burn his work because he has political ambitions and he will NEVER GET ELECTED AS A DEIST/ATHEIST. So he HIDES his irreligiousness to a great degree and, on occasion, does the “God talk” because it works!

And you call me ignorant. What a joke.

Oh, mynym, you never managed to rebutt the Japan thing. What I posted wasn’t from some intellectual light-weights who just ramble on in the internet. Rather, I summarized some pretty broad-based work that was published in International Journal of Law and Psychiatry and was a combined survey/research article with all these references and addressed/criticized/incorporated/refuted their claims (many of which, BTW, I’ve read):

Abel, G. G., Mittelman, M. S., & Becker, J. V. (1985). “Sexual Offenders: Results of assessment and recommendations for treatment”. In M. H. Ben-Aron, S. J. Huckle, & C. D. Webster (Eds.), Clinical criminology: The assessment and treatment of criminal behavior (pp. 191-205). Toronto, Canada: M & M Graphic.

Abramson, P. R., & Hayashi, H. (1984). “Pornography in Japan: Cross cultural and theoretical considerations”. In M. N. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Pornography and Sexual Aggression (pp. 173-183). New York: Academic Press.

Amis, K., Anderson, J. N. D., Beasley-Murray, G. R., et al. (1972). Pornography: The Longford Report. London: Coronet Books: Hodder Paperbacks, Ltd.

Anonymous. (1991a, 31 March). Racy comics a labeled lot now in Japan. Sunday Honolulu Star Bulletin and Advertiser.

Anonymous. (1991b, 5 February). Tokyo Telephone Sex. Honolulu Advertiser.

Anonymous. (1992, 2 October). Police warn magazines over nudes. The Japan Times pp. 2.

Baron, L., & Strauss, M. A. (1987). Four Theories of Rape in American Society: A State-Level Analysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Becker, J., & Stein R. M. (1991). “Is sexual erotica associated with sexual deviance in adolescent males?” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 14, 85-95.

Brannigan, A. (1987). “Sex and aggression in the Lab: Implications for Public Policy? A Review Essay”. Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 2, 177-185.

Brannigan, A., & Goldenberg, S. (1986). “Social Science versus jurisprudence in Wagner: The study of Pornography, Harm, and the Law of obscenity in Canada”. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 11:419-431.

Brannigan, A., & Goldenberg, S. (1991). “Pornography, context, and the common law of obscenity”. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 14, 97-116.

Ben-Veniste, R. (1971). Pornography and Sex Crime: The Danish Experience, Technical Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography (pp. 245-261). Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.

Burgess, A. W., & Hartman, C. R. (1987). “Child Abuse Aspects of Pornography”. Psychiatric Annals, 17, 248-253.

Burrill, J. (1991). Lowering the Boom on Sex Comics. Limousine City Guide, 33.

Canada. (1985). Report of the special select committee on pornography and prostitution : Ottawa; Supply and Services.

Christensen, F. M. (1990). Pornography: The Other Side. New York: Praeger.

Clifford, W. (1980). “Why is it safer to live in Tokyo? An exploratory symposium”. Paper presented at the Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.

Conyers, L., & Harvey, P. D. (1996). Religion and Crime: Do they go together? Free Inquiry, 16(3), 46-48.

Court, J. H. (1977). “Pornography and sex crimes: A reevaluation in light of recent trends around the world”. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 5, 129-157.

Court, J. H. (1984). “Sex and violence: A ripple effect”. In N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Pornography and Sexual Aggression (pp. 143-172). New York: Academic Press.

Diamond, M. (1984). SexWatching: The World of Sexual Behaviour. London: Macdonald Co. Ltd.

Diamond, M. (1986). SexWatching: The World of Sexual Behavior (Japanese Version). Tokyo: Shogakukan.

Diamond, M., & Karlen, A. (1980). Sexual Decisions. Boston: Little, Brown.

Diamond, M., & Karlen, A. (1985). Sexual Decisions (Japanese edition). Tokyo: Shogakukan.

Donnerstein, E. (1984). “Pornography: Its effect on violence against women”. In N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Pornography and sexual aggression (pp. 53-81). New York: Academic Press.

Donnerstein, E., & Barrett, G. (1978). “The effects of erotic stimuli on male aggression toward women”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 180-188.

Dore, R. P. (1958). City Life in Japan. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Dougher, M. J. (1988, Feb.). “Assessment of Sex Offenders”. In B. K. Schwartz & H. R. H. Cellini (Eds.), A Practitioner’s Guide to Treating the Incarcerated Male Sex Offender (pp. 77-84, Chapter 78). Washington, D. C.: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.

Downs, J. F. (1990). “Nudity in Japanese Visual Media: A cross-cultural Observation”. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 583-594.

Effron, S. (1997) In Japan, even toddlers now attend cram schools. The Honolulu Advertiser, Feb. 16. A-16.

Ellis, L. (1989). Theories of Rape: Inquires into the causes of sexual aggression. New York: Hemisphere Publishing.

Fisher, W. A., & Barak, A. (1991). “Pornography, Erotica, and Behavior: More questions than answers”. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 14, 65-83.

Gebhard, P. H., Gagnon, J. H., Pomeroy, W. B., & Christenson, C. V. (1965). Sex Offenders. New York: Harper & Row.

Giglio, D. (1985). “Pornography in Denmark: A public policy for the United States?” Comparative Social Research, 8, 281-300.

Goldstein, M. J., & Kant, H. S. (1973). Pornography and Sexual Deviance: A Report of the Legal and Behavioral Institute. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Greenfeld, K. T. (1994). Speed Tribes. New York: Harper Collins.

Groth, A. N. (1979). Men who Rape: The psychology of the offender. New York: Plenum.

Groth, N. A., Burgess, A. W., & Holstrom, L. L. (1977). “Rape, power and sexuality”. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 1239-1243.

Hijirida, K., & Yoshikawa, M. (1987). Japanese Language and Culture for Business and Travel. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Home Office. (1979). Committee on obscenity and film censorship. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.

Howitt, D., & Cumberbatch, G. (1990). Pornography: Impacts and Influences. A review of available research evidence on the effects of pornography. London: Commissioned by the British Home Office Research and Planning Unit.

JASE (1991). Survey on Comics Among Youth. Tokyo: Japanese Association for Sex Education.

Knopp, F. H. (1984). Retraining adult sex offenders: Methods and models. Orwell, VT: Safer Society.

Kuro, H. (1954). Nikutai bungaku no seiri. Vol. 4, Tokyo: Shisoo no Kagaku.

Kutchinsky, B. (1973a). “The effect of easy availability of pornography on the incidence of sex crimes: The Danish experience”. Journal of Social Issues, 29, 163-181.

Kutchinsky, B. (1973b). “Eroticism without censorship”. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 217-225.

Kutchinsky, B. (1978). “Pornography in Denmark – a general survey”. In R. Dhavan & C. Davies (Eds.), Censorship and Obscenity: Behavioral Aspects (pp. 111-126). London: Martin Robertson.

Kutchinsky, B. (1983). “Obscenity and pornography: Behavioral aspects”. In S. H. Kadish (Ed.), Encyclopedia of crime and justice (Vol. 3, pp. 1077-1086). New York: Free Press.

Kutchinsky, B. (1985a). “Experiences with pornography and prostitution in Denmark” (Revision of Chap V in J. Kiedrowski and J. M. van Dikj: Pornography and Prostitution in Denmark, France, West Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. Stencilserie Nr. 30): Kriminalistisk Instituts Stencilserie. 20 pages.

Kutchinsky, B. (1985b). “Pornography and its effects in Denmark and the United States: A rejoinder and beyond”. Comparative Social Research, 8, 301-330.

Kutchinsky, B. (1987). “Deception and Propaganda”. Transaction, Social Science and Modern SOCIETY, 24(5), 21-24.

Kutchinsky, B. (1991). “Pornography and Rape: Theory and Practice? Evidence from Crime Data in Four Countries Where Pornography is Easily Available”. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 14, 47-64.

Kutchinsky, B. (1992). “The Politics of Pornography Research”. Law & Society Review, 26, 447-455.

Kutchinsky, B. (1994). Pornography: Impacts and Influences (Critique of a Review of Research Evidence). [Preprint sent as Personal communication; Berl Kutchinsky died before publication.]

Lab, S. (1987). “Pornography and Aggression: A response to the U.S. Attorney General’s Commission”. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 19, 301-321.

Liebert, R. M., Neale, J. M., & Davison, E. S. (1973). The early window. New York: Pergamon Press.

Linz, D., Penrod, S. D., & Donnerstein, E. (1987). “The Attorney General’ Commission: The gaps between findings and facts”. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 4, 713-736.

Lynn, B. W. (1986). Polluting the Censorship Debate: A Summary and Critique of the Final Report of the Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography. Washington, D. C.: American Civil Liberties Union.

MacKinnon, C. A. (1993). Only Words. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

Mainichi-shinbun. (1990). “Wakayama Prefecture calls for control of manga”. Mainichi-shinbun , 11:23

Malamuth, N. M., & Donnerstein, E. (Eds.). (1984). Pornography and Sexual Aggression. New York: Academic Press.

Marshall, W. L. (1988). “The use of sexually explicit stimuli by rapists, child molesters, and non-offenders”. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 267-288.

Meese, E. (1986). Attorney General (Edwin Meese) Commission Report , Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Nihon No Tokei. (1996). (Japan’s Statistics). Tokyo: Somucho Tokei Kyoku (Statistics Bureau).

Nobile, P., & Nadler, E. (1986). United States of America vs. SEX: How the Meese Commission Lied about Pornography. New York: Minotaur Press.

Okudaira, Y. (1979). “Indecency and Social Culture or Custom”. Hogaku-Seminar, (December), 2-9.

Osanka, F. M., & Lee, J. S. L. (1989). Sourcebook on Pornography. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.

Oshima, T. (1979). “What’s wrong in Indecency”. Hogaku-Seminar, (December), 10-15.

Pornography, (1970). Report of the U.S. Commission on Obscenity and Pornography (Technical Report ): U.S. Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Propper, M. M. (1972). Exposure to sexually oriented materials among young male prisoners. (Technical Report volume 8): Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Radin, C. (1996, 8 March). “Rape in Japan: The crime that has no name”. Boston Globe, pp. A-1, column 5.

Roposensho, (Japanese National Police Agency) (1989). Japanese Penal Code. Tokyo: Japanese National Police Agency

Roposensho, (Japanese National Police Agency) (1995). Annual Report of Japanese Crime Statistics. Tokyo: Japanese National Police Agency.

Scott, J. E., & Schwalm, L. A. (1988). “Rape rates and the circulation rates of adult magazines”. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 241-250.

Shupan Nenkan (1988, 1997). Annual Report for Publishers. Tokyo: Shupan Nenkan

Somucho. (1993). Survey of youth reading manga. [internal report for Youth Authority]. Tokyo: Government Management and Coordinating Agency.

Silbert, M. H., & Pines, A. M. (1984). “Pornography and the sexual abuse of women”. Sex Roles, 10, 857-868.

Sommers, E. K., & Check, J. (1987). “An empirical investigation of the role of pornography in the verbal and physical abuse of women”. Violence and Victims, 2, 189-209.

Tieter, L. (1987). The pursuit of the perfect penis: The medicalization of male sexuality. London: Sage.

Tjaden, P. J. (1988). “Pornography and Sex Education”. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 208-212.

Uchida, T. (1979). “Dairy of Lawyer in Charge”. Hogaku-Seminar, (December), 16-31.

Uchiyama, A. (1996). “A study on the attitude of girls toward the commercialization of sex”. Reports of the National Research Institute of Police Science. Research on Prevention of Crime and Delinquency, 37(2 / December), 1-13.

Walker, C. E. (1970). Erotic stimuli and the aggressive sexual offender. (Technical report volume 7 (pp. 91-147): U.S. Commission on Obscenity and Pornography. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Wilson, W. C. (1978). “Can pornography contribute to the prevention of sexual problems?” In C. B. Qualls, J. P. Wincze, & D. H. Barlow (Eds.), The Prevention of Sexual Disorders: Issues and Approaches (pp. 159-179). New York: Plenum Press.

Winick, C. & Evans, J. T. (1986) “The relationship between enforcement of state pornography laws and rates of sex crime arrests”. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 25: 439-453.

Winick, C. (1985). “A content analysis of sexually explicit magazines sold in an adult bookstore”. Journal of Sex Research, 21, 206-210.

Woodruff, J. (1991, 7 July 1991). “Japan’s police finding it difficult to enforce informal ban on nudity”. Sunday Honolulu Star Bulletin & Advertiser, pp. A 26.

Zillmann, D. (1984). Connections between Sex and Aggression. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1982). “Pornography, sexual callousness and the trivialization of rape”. Journal of Communication, 32, 10-21.

Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1984). “Effects of massive exposure to pornography”. In N. M. Malamuth & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Pornography and Sexual Aggression (pp. 115-138). New York: Academic Press.

Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1988a). “Effects of prolonged consumption of pornography on family values”. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 518-544.

Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1988b). “Pornography’s impact on sexual satisfaction”. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 438-453.

Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1989). Pornography: Research Advances and Policy Considerations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Zillmann, D., & Weaver, J. B. (1989). “Pornography and Men’s sexual callousness toward women”. In D. Zillmann & J. Bryant (Eds.), Pornography: Research Advances and Policy Considerations (pp. 95-125). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

And, in agreement or not with the causality factors of the final conclusions, it’s the way SCIENCE works. Not the assertion-with-out-facts garbage you spew.

This is cool, you have to try it. I guessed 70727, and this game guessed it! See it here -

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Nick Matzke published on January 19, 2006 5:53 PM.

That big tent was the previous entry in this blog.

Deep dark secrets in South Carolina is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Author Archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.361

Site Meter