Answering Sal Cordova’s Questions

Over at Dembski’s blogosphere home for wayward followers, Sal Cordova has been crowing lately about what he apparently thinks is a real stumper for those who oppose ID. Twice now he has smugly declared that two PT contributors, Nick Matzke and Jack Krebs, are “reluctant” to answer his conundrum and that, any way it’s answered, our side is “hosed”. So excited about this “vise strategy” that he can’t wait to get us in court to ask us, apparently thinking that he has devised some sort of Perry Mason moment. The problem for him is that his question cum argument by implication is in fact trivially easy to answer.

Continue Reading at Dispatches from the Culture Wars. Comments may be left there.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Ed Brayton published on February 8, 2006 7:38 PM.

Ohio Board’s Science Advisory Committee Disavows Creationist Science Standard was the previous entry in this blog.

Intelligent Design and String Theory is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Author Archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.381

Site Meter