Interview with an Evolutionary Biologist

| 2 Comments | 1 TrackBack

We recently interviewed Dr. Massimo Pigliucci for Darwin Day. Dr. Pigliucci is an associate professor in the Department of Ecology & Evolution at SUNY-Stony Brook and founded Darwin Day at the University of Tennessee. We at the thumb would like to thank Dr. Pigliucci for taking time out of his busy schedule to answer our questions.

Can you tell us a little about your scientific background and current lab research?

I have a PhD in botany (University of Connecticut) and one in philosophy (University of Tennessee). My interests include research on gene-environment interactions (nature-nurture), as well as philosophy of science. My lab’s web page is

Can you tell us a little about the history of Darwin Day? Why did you start Darwin Day?

A good intro to the history of D-Day can be found in the Wikipedia. I started one of the first versions at the University of Tennessee in 1997, in response to a misguided (and fortunately failed) attempt of the Tennessee legislature to pass an anti-evolution law demanding equal teaching time for creationism.

What did you do this year for Darwin Day?

We had a daylong information booth on campus with exhibits on evolution (including live animals), and graduate students and faculty answering questions about evolution. We also showed several documentaries on evolution, followed by brief discussion sessions. The two main events were a keynote speech by Eugenie Scott, of the National Center for Science Education, as well as a panel discussion following a presentation of the documentary Flock of Dodos, by Randy Olson, on so-called “Intelligent Design.”

Do you have any stories of memorable Darwin Day events?

The first time we decided to do it (February 1997 edition) we started organizing it a bit too late to find a high-profile speaker. Nonetheless, I asked Doug Futuyma at SUNY-Stony Brook (who is now my colleague in the same department) if he could come on short notice. Doug published one of the first books critical of creationism, “Science on Trial,” back in 1987, and his graduate-level textbook on evolutionary biology is the standard in the field. Doug fired back an email to tell me that, yes, he was indeed very busy, but that he heard that we in Tennessee “really needed help,” so he would drop other things and come. It was very nice of him, and it turned out to be a wonderfully attended and informative event.

Have you heard about the Evolution Sunday Project? What do you think about it?

I think it’s a good idea. We certainly don’t need more conflict between science and religion, and a project like that can help.

You’ve written on the anti-evolution movement. Do you think ID will change at all in response to its defeat in the Dover trial?

Not likely, I have a sense that Dover was ID’s Waterloo. But not to worry, I’ve already heard the newest buzzword used by creationists: you see, it’s not “intelligent design theory” anymore, it’s “sudden emergence theory”…

Any suggestions to our readers on starting their own Darwin Day activities?

Check out our web page ( for ideas and documents to download (copyright free!) to get something started.

Massimo Pigliucci is an associate professor in the Department of Ecology & Evolution at SUNY-Stony Brook. We would once again like to thank him for answering our questions.

1 TrackBack

PZ and Ed have both mentioned this NY Times article suggesting that Ohio's about ready to cut out its cancer that are the Jon Wells-inspired "critical analysis of evolution" from their lesson plan. Richard Hoppe of Ohio Citizens for Science... Read More


Massimo is a good man. I ran into his work quite by accident about a year ago. Knowing nothing about ID whatsoever, I had to research the topic for a class presentation. So I went on a downloading spree, collecting every evo / creationism audio file I could find. One of them was a two hour debate between Massimo and Kent Hovind, hosted by Infidelguy. That was also the first I’d heard of Hovind. Ever since that class, I’ve become a dedicated creationism-watcher, partly due to Massimo’s efforts on that file. The sheer wackiness of Hovind was sometime funny, always bizarre, and definately a little scary. If you can find it, its worth the listen.

He is a good guy - and gives really good talks, I’ve heard him talk at the Evolution meetings. He also has a pretty good book about the evolution-creationism debate called Denying Evolution: Creationism, Scientism, and the Nature of Science. It’s not too technical and not too much philosophical jargon either so it’s good for the non-scientific audience.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Reed A. Cartwright published on February 13, 2006 6:29 PM.

Evolution Sunday: The Day After was the previous entry in this blog.

Nobel Laureate: “Intelligent Design” is An Attack on All of Science is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Author Archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.381

Site Meter