Ohio news

| 19 Comments | 4 TrackBacks

School Board Kills Lesson Plan Criticizing Evolution

COLUMBUS, Ohio – The state school board has voted to eliminate a lesson plan and science standards that critics said opened the door to teaching intelligent design, a form of creationism.

  • AP News

    COLUMBUS, Ohio - The Ohio school board voted Tuesday to eliminate a passage in the state’s science standards that critics said opened the door to teaching intelligent design.

    The Ohio Board of Education voted 11-4 to delete material encouraging students to seek evidence for and against evolution.

    The decision represents the latest setback for the intelligent design movement, which holds that life is so complex it must have been created by a higher authority.

  • School Board Kills Lesson Plan Criticizing Evolution

    The board also directed a committee to study whether a replacement lesson was needed.

    The vote was a reversal of a 9-8 decision a month ago to keep the lesson plan. But three board members who voted in January to keep the plan in place were absent Tuesday, and supporters of the science material pledged to force a new vote to return the material soon.

  • CBS News, Ohio Board Votes Out Evolution Lesson Plan
  • NCSE, Ohio’s antievolution lesson plan removed
  • Discovery Institute, Darwinists Bully Ohio School Board into Censoring Teaching of Evolution
  • Guardian, School board delivers blow to creationism , Suzanne Goldenberg

    Three board members who support the teaching of intelligent design were absent, and could try to force a re-vote.

    But Patricia Princehouse, a biologist at Case Western University and a leader of Ohio Citizens for Science, called the decision a “huge victory”. Although the model lessons plans were not compulsory, Ms Princehouse said their use was widespread and opponents of evolution had drawn on their experiences in Ohio to gain greater currency for their beliefs.

  • New York Times, Ohio Board Undoes Stand on Evolution, Jodi Rudoren

    While the Ohio lesson plan does not mention intelligent design, which posits that life is too complex to be explained by evolution alone, critics contend that the critical analysis language is simply design in disguise.

    “This lesson is bad news, the ‘critically analyze’ wording is bad news,” Martha W. Wise, the board member who offered the emergency motion, told her colleagues during 90 minutes of contentious debate here Tuesday afternoon. “It is deeply unfair to the children of this state to mislead them about the nature of science.”

  • USA Today, Evolution supporters win in Ohio, Greg Toppo

    Scientists had assailed the Ohio standards as an attempt to repackage intelligent design and introduce religious principles into science class. Intelligent design holds that life on Earth is so complex that it could have been created only by an “intelligent designer” such as God.

  • MSNBC, Ohio board deletes disputed evolution language
  • Discovery Institute, Ohio State Board of Education Repeals Critical Analysis Policy, Casey Luskin
  • World Peace Herald, Ohio drops anti-evolution lesson plan, UPI
  • MTV, Ohio To Remove Anti-Evolution Language From State Science Curriculum, Gil Kaufman
  • MichNews.com, GOD-EVOLUTION DEBATE WON’T QUIT, By J. Grant Swank, Jr.

    So evolution should be taught in Faith Class if it’s going to be put upon the students in public schools. It does not certainly belong in science class. It’s not a science. It’s not a proven fact. Now of course if there is a chapter in science class about theories, then evolution can be presented as a theory as much as Alice in Wonderland can be presented as a theory. But nothing more than a theory.

Background Information

How it all got started

  • Ohio education board may remove evolution lesson

    A state Board of Education member said today that she has the votes to remove a disputed lesson plan from Ohio’s science curriculum that allows teachers and students to question the legitimacy of evolution.

    Board member Martha Wise said she plans to offer a motion at Tuesday’s board meeting to the remove the language that she says promotes “intelligent design” unless the panel takes other action to address her concerns. The concept states that a higher power must have been involved in the creation of life because it is so complex, but critics contend it is a religious theory masquerading as science.

    Wise, a board member for 28 years, has called herself a creationist who believes that science should be taught.

    Her proposal would delete language from the state science standards that allows for a critical analysis of evolution. She offered a similar motion at the board’s meeting last month that was defeated 9-8.

    Wise said she had persuaded some members to change their votes but declined to name them, saying delicate negotiations would continue until a possible vote Tuesday afternoon.

  • Free Times Ohio, Weird Science: How “Intelligent Design” Got A Toehold In Ohio Public Schools, and What’s Being Done To Dislodge It, By Charu Gupta

    Ohio Board of Education meetings typically are sedate and officious affairs, and the January 2006 gathering started that way too. Until the topic of intelligent design was raised. That’s when board member Deborah Owens Fink, and probably most others in attendance, began to find it difficult to keep emotions in check. …

    Weeks can’t help but wonder how Ely got on that writing committee. No one in the university’s biology department knew about the application deadline, Weeks says, and no one was asked to apply. Besides, “Ely is the only person in the whole University of Akron’s biology department who doesn’t believe in evolution,” Weeks says, “and somehow he’s picked from here?”

4 TrackBacks

Ohio may join Wisconsin--hope for Kansas? from Law Evolution Science and Junk Science on February 14, 2006 5:00 PM

The New York Times (reg. req.) reports that the Ohio school board may change its policy that allows for teaching intelligent design in schools. Midwest common sense is breaking out all over. Excerpt: All of that adds up to a Read More

The Ohio Board of Education voted 11-4 to delete material encouraging students to seek evidence for and against certain elements of evolutionary science. [Link] Nice!!! 11-4 - I wonder if Cochran was one of the 4.... Thanks to The... Read More

In a memorable passage from his landmark ruling, Judge Jones argued that science could not be defined differently for "students than it is defined in the scientific community as an affirmative action program". Ohio seems to have followed this sound a... Read More

I’m genuinely confused. Can some of the more experienced IDers explain why critcism of evolutionary theory is supressed within the scientific community? Comment by Kibitz — February 15, 2006 @ 7:19 pm It’s really simple. 72% of the most ... Read More

19 Comments

Excellent news. Is there any information yet on what caused the change of heart on the part of the school board? And why are the numbers different: if this is the same group that voted to retain the standards, that number was seventeen; this is fifteen.

Did I miss something?

I’ve been saying for a while that I thought that 2005, with the situations in Dover and Kansas, would be seen as the high-water mark of the Intelligent Design movement. Fortunately, that seems to be coming true.

This was in the cards sooner or later, if one followed the machinations on the Ohio Board. But disturbingly—I say disturbingly because Toledo is only one of thousands of local systems in Ohio—today the Ohio ACLU sent a letter to the Toledo Public Schools requesting that they stop their teachers from teaching creationism, aka “intelligent design”, in biology classes. This may have stemmed from an article in the Toledo Blade last week reporting, by name, teachers who unapologetically taught ID in their science classes; to be fair the article also reported on science teachers whose biology instruction was suffused with evolution. But the Toledo Schools’ official position is that they require their teachers to follow the state mandated curriculum. That seems to be wishful thinking at best.

All of which just goes to show that all the public debate aired at the state or local board level often has little impact on what actually transpires in each classroom. Sometimes those classrooms are as hermetically sealed as the minds of ID/Creationist advocates. But, most often, a teacher with no expressed administration support will avoid evolution altogether, shortchanging hordes of students about the real world. We have a long way to go.

Is there any information yet on what caused the change of heart on the part of the school board?

Well, aside from the fact that I don’t think Dover had fully sunk in a month ago, the Board learned for the first time that the majority of its own science advisory committee had objected to the bad plan - in writing - using words like “lies”.

And why are the numbers different: if this is the same group that voted to retain the standards, that number was seventeen; this is fifteen.

The full board is 19. Two were absent for the last vote, 4 were this time. But even if all 4 were there, and voted with IDers, they still would have lost 11-8.

Is there any information yet on what caused the change of heart on the part of the school board?

Oh, I forgot to mention Casey Luskin was there and - I guess - addressed the board before I got there, representing the Disco Inst. Perhaps he was instrumental in convincing some board members that they didn’t want to be tarred with that brush!

All you PTers (and the people of Ohio and Pennsylvania etc.) deserve kudos. We are not currently facing this nonsense in Canada and hopefully won’t but it is gratifying to know our neighbour is taking steps to stop from becoming a scientific backwater! Thanks.

The Discovery Institute’s spin on this should begin at any moment. We can predict an endless stream of article talking about “activist” board members, stifling of free speech, “darwinsim” and dogmatism, etc. No doubt Dembski and his pocket pal, Dave Scot, should provide some great comedy as well.

Let the insane creationist clown whining begin!

Just a great, great job by the Ohio reality-based community! Thanks so much!

Right on cue. EvolutionNewsAndWhining has the following headline:

Darwinists Bully Ohio School Board into Censoring Teaching of Evolution

Congrats to the Darwinian Pressure Group, Delta Pi Gamma (still waiting on dues from harold so we can put a down payment on our fraternity BMW). I guess the threat of a genetically modified plague of locusts did the trick.

“Fraternity BMW”???? What happened to the PT Cruiser with double helix decals?

Impressed by Rob Crowther’s spin, I went to see what his bio says. Obviously he’s not a biologist or other kind of actual scientist, but I wanted to see which it was: lawyer or engineer. Instead of finding that, I found something even more mockable.

Did you know that Ed Meese is a fellow of the Disco Institute?

Darwinists Bully Ohio School Board into Censoring Teaching of Evolution

For some reason, the Disco Inst doesn’t quote any scientists deploring the decision: just Casey Luskin and John West.

Russell wrote

Oh, I forgot to mention Casey Luskin was there and - I guess - addressed the board before I got there, representing the Disco Inst. Perhaps he was instrumental in convincing some board members that they didn’t want to be tarred with that brush!

Casey did not speak to the Board as a whole. He did not fill out the necessary form. Ohio Citizens for Science also decided not to speak, since the period for comment was after the vote and would have no effect except to aggravate board members who would have to stay late. Some ID creationism supporters (many fewer than I expected) were there and some spoke during the public comment period after the vote, but it was too little too late.

OCS distributed the press release in my PT post here.

I’ll have the full text of the final motion posted there when I have transcribed it from the digital recording I made. The motion was amended so a final printed form was not available during or immediately after the meeting.

RBH

Posted by Russell on February 14, 2006 05:33 PM (e)

Oh, I forgot to mention Casey Luskin was there and - I guess - addressed the board before I got there, representing the Disco Inst. Perhaps he was instrumental in convincing some board members that they didn’t want to be tarred with that brush!

Be nice to know the backstory on this. “Hey Bob, which way are you going to vote?” “Well Fred, I was on the fence, hell, I don’t know any science, but it occurred to me…the guy on the pro-ID side was a lawyer preacher, and all the science people said he was lying and “insulting to science”. So since my IQ is higher than my thermostat, I’m going with the scientists.”

KiwiInOz asks: “Fraternity BMW”???? What happened to the PT Cruiser with double helix decals?”

I took off in the PT cruiser several months ago for a road trip but have returned it washed and waxed, it’s parked out back and there’s a fresh keg in the cooler. Delta Pi Gamma (Scientia et Fermentum)

– Did you know that Ed Meese is a fellow of the Disco Institute? –

No.

But it certainly does not surprise me.

A heart-felt thanks to the scientists, educators, and other concerned citizens of Ohio who worked so hard and so well to defeat this idiocy.

Every victory reduces the likelihood that other boards in states will try the same silliness.

Did you know that Ed Meese is a fellow of the Disco Institute?

Yes I did. But remember that the Disco Institute is a ‘right wing think tank’ and handles other issues as well. The Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture handles the ID stuff, but is only part of the vast Evil Empire. For example, their Cascadia Project is doing a traffic study on Bill Gates’ dime.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by PvM published on February 14, 2006 4:52 PM.

Flock of Dodos was the previous entry in this blog.

The Win in Ohio is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Categories

Archives

Author Archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.361

Site Meter