Over at Uncommon Descent, Salvdor Cordova offers this amusing essay about why ID is a far more useful framework than evolution for scientific research. I'm sure everyone will be shocked to learn that his argument is, well, not correct. I've posted a full reply over at EvolutionBlog. Comments can be left there. Enjoy!
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Jason Rosenhouse published on June 16, 2006 7:00 PM.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Categories
- Assault on Science (424)
- Bathroom Wall (13)
- Book Reviews (60)
- Conferences (21)
- Darwin's Finches (1)
- Designoids (8)
- Education and Legal (84)
- Eugenics (1)
- Evolution (520)
- Expelled (69)
- Flyers/Pamphlets (3)
- Humor (136)
- ID/Creationism (65)
- Icons (1)
- Journal Club (28)
- Legal Issues (121)
- Manufactroversy (11)
- Medicine and Evolution (19)
- Metatalk (87)
- MustRead (5)
- News Roundup (27)
- Prebiotic Chemistry (5)
- Question of the Day (6)
- Question of the Moment
- Quote of the Day (14)
- Religion and Politics (11)
- Research News (53)
- Resources for Biologists (19)
- Shoptalk (28)
- Slightly Off Topic (48)
- Steve Steve (69)
- Sticky (2)
- Their Own Words (19)
- Theological Issues with Intelligent Design (9)
- War on Science (38)
- What motivates creationism (20)
