On his Evolution List blog, Allen MacNeill discusses a paper written by one of his students of the Cornell âEvolution and Designâ seminar. The paper, written by Elena Broaddus, discusses the topic of our ââinnateâ tendency to infer purpose in natureâ.
The posting starts with some interesting pictures of âfacesâ found in nature. We are all very familiar with detecting âdesignâ in clouds and there are countless instances where people see faces or other attributes in natural objects. Elena addresses this âinnate tendencyâ that leads us to infer purpose in nature.
Allen MacNeill Wrote:
I would like to draw some more attention to E. Broaddus paper on the âinnateâ tendency to infer purpose in nature. I have long suspected that humans (and perhaps many vertebrates, especially mammals) have this tendency. As an evolutionary psychologist, I at least partially subscribe to the idea that the human mind is composed primarily of âmodulesâ whose functions are to process particular kinds of sensory information in such a way as to yield adaptive responses to complex environmental information. This is precisely what Broaddus argues for in her paper: that the human mind (and, by extension, the vertebrate âmindâ in general) has a module that is adapted specifically for the precise and rapid inference of intentionality in nature. That such an âagency detectorâ (to use the commonly accepted term for such a module) would have immense adaptive value is obvious. In an environment in which other entities do indeed have âintentionsâ (i.e. predators, competitors, potential mates, etc.), the ability to detect and infer the possible consequences of acting upon such intentions would confer immense adaptive value on any organism with such an ability.
The predicted existence of such an innate system to infer design may help explain why the Explanatory Filter has yet to be applied in any rigorous manner to detect design.
Read more at Evolution List