Over on the hopefully-named âID the Futureâ podcast website run by the Discovery Institute, Casey Luskin has posted a short interview with Michael Behe â evidently recorded in-studio rather than over the phone, although, for some reason, Behe sounds like he is sitting in a cave.
Anyway, the topic of the interview is Beheâs response to the Pallen and Matzke (2006) article on flagellum evolution in Nature Reviews Microbiology. As I pointed out on PT last month, among other things, the NRM article showed that the ID advocates didnât know what they were talking about on the topics of (1) number of required flagellum parts, and (2) number of âuniqueâ, i.e. non-homologous, flagellum parts. These points are obviously important, since the ID advocates themselves have emphasized them repeatedly â almost in hypnotically repetitious fashion, actually â as major reasons that the flagellum could not have evolved gradually.
Syntax Error: mismatched tag at line 9, column 723, byte 3081 at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.16/mach/XML/Parser.pm line 187.