The eye as a contingent, diverse, complex product of evolutionary processes

| 1 Comment
octo_eye.jpg

Ian Musgrave has just posted an excellent article on the poor design of the vertebrate eye compared to the cephalopod eye; it's very thorough, and explains how the clumsy organization of the eye clearly indicates that it is the product of an evolutionary process rather than of any kind of intelligent design. A while back, Russ Fernald of Stanford University published a fine review of eye evolution that summarizes another part of the evolution argument: it's not just that the eye has awkward 'design' features that are best explained by contingent and developmental processes, but that the diversity of eyes found in the animal kingdom share deep elements that link them together as the product of common descent. If all we had to go on was suboptimal design, one could argue for an Incompetent Designer who slapped together various eyes in different ways as an exercise in whimsy (strangely enough, though, this is not the kind of designer IDists want to propose)…but the diversity we do see reveals a notable historical pattern of constraint.

Continue reading "The eye as a contingent, diverse, complex product of evolutionary processes" (on Pharyngula)

1 Comment

OT

Dawkins - “Go to a proper university.”

Classic.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0Y7lhqkiig

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by PZ Myers published on November 15, 2006 9:09 AM.

Is Life Inevitable? was the previous entry in this blog.

Server News is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Categories

Archives

Author Archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.361

Site Meter