Evolution of direct development in echinoderms

| 4 Comments | 1 TrackBack

In chapter 14 of the Origin of Species, Darwin wondered about the whole process of metamorphosis. Some species undergo radical transformations from embryo to adult, passing through larval stages that are very different from the adult, while others proceed directly to the adult form. This process of metamorphosis is of great interest to both developmental and evolutionary biologists, because what we see are major transitions in form not over long periods of time, but within a single generation.

We are so much accustomed to see a difference in structure between the embryo and the adult, that we are tempted to look at this difference as in some necessary manner contingent on growth. But there is no reason why, for instance, the wing of a bat, or the fin of a porpoise, should not have been sketched out with all their parts in proper proportion, as soon as any part became visible. In some whole groups of animals and in certain members of other groups this is the case, and the embryo does not at any period differ widely from the adult: thus Owen has remarked in regard to cuttlefish, "There is no metamorphosis; the cephalopodic character is manifested long before the parts of the embryo are completed." Landshells and fresh-water crustaceans are born having their proper forms, whilst the marine members of the same two great classes pass through considerable and often great changes during their development. Spiders, again, barely undergo any metamorphosis. The larvae of most insects pass through a worm-like stage, whether they are active and adapted to diversified habits, or are inactive from being placed in the midst of proper nutriment or from being fed by their parents; but in some few cases, as in that of Aphis, if we look to the admirable drawings of the development of this insect, by Professor Huxley, we see hardly any trace of the vermiform stage.

Why do some lineages undergo amazing processes of morphological change over their life histories, while others quickly settle on a single form and stick with it through their entire life? In some cases, we can even find closely related species where one goes through metamorphosis, and another doesn't; this is clearly a relatively labile character in evolution. And one of the sharpest, clearest examples of this fascinating flexibility is found in the sea urchins.

Continue reading "Evolution of direct development in echinoderms" (on Pharyngula)

1 TrackBack

Welcome, welcome, one and all to the 64th edition of the blog carnival for infidels and heathens everywhere, Carnival of the Godless! As per usual, we have a bumper crop of posts covering a large array of topics so let's not waste time and get this sh Read More


why is it that reasonable Kansans always seem to have such obtuse and meaningless things to say?

just so.

Reasonable Kansan has, I believe, stolen Grady’s signature knee-jerk. I hope Grady’s getting royalties

A Reasonable Kansan said “Just so”

So what? (yawn)

But echinoderms are still just starfish!

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by PZ Myers published on June 2, 2007 12:52 PM.

Iowa State University President Gregory Geoffroy: Denied! was the previous entry in this blog.

Best Behe takedown *ever* is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Author Archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.381

Site Meter