You may have noticed that the Montana Law Review let the DI folks have the last word in their symposium on the Dover trial; I’m going to fix that. Pete Irons has graciously sent me his full reply to the “rebuttal” written by Luskin, West and DeWolf and given me permission to post it here. The first article can be found here. Irons’ first reply is found here. The DI’s response is found here. You can read Irons’ final reply to their rebuttal, go to Dispatches from the Culture Wars. Comments may be left there.
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://pandasthumb.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.fcgi/328.
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Ed Brayton published on June 10, 2007 9:33 PM.
“Adam” and AiG’s Strange Bedfellows was the previous entry in this blog.
Exaptation vs Front Loading: Why Evolution Wins is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Categories
- Assault on Science (344)
- Bathroom Wall (13)
- Book Reviews (51)
- Conferences (19)
- Designoids (8)
- Education and Legal (31)
- Eugenics (1)
- Evolution (332)
- Expelled (68)
- Flyers/Pamphlets (3)
- Humor (128)
- ID/Creationism (34)
- Icons (1)
- Journal Club (28)
- Legal Issues (110)
- Manufactroversy (5)
- Medicine and Evolution (15)
- Metatalk (78)
- MustRead (5)
- News Roundup (20)
- Prebiotic Chemistry (2)
- Question of the Day (6)
- Question of the Moment
- Quote of the Day (14)
- Religion and Politics (7)
- Research News (45)
- Resources for Biologists (14)
- Shoptalk (23)
- Slightly Off Topic (17)
- Steve Steve (62)
- Sticky (1)
- Their Own Words (18)
- Theological Issues with Intelligent Design (9)
- War on Science (23)
- What motivates creationism (19)