Return of the Son of the Bride of Haeckel

| 1 Comment

The Discovery Institute is so relieved — they finally found a textbook that includes a reworked version of Haeckel's figure. Casey Luskin is very excited. I'm a little disappointed, though: apparently, nobody at the Discovery Institute reads Pharyngula. I posted a quick summary in September of 2003 that went through several textbooks, and showed a couple of examples where redrawn versions of Haeckel's diagram were used. More recently, I posted a fairly exhaustive survey by Patrick Frank of the use of that diagram since 1923, which showed that it was rare, and that the concept of recapitulation was uniformly criticized. Really, guys, the horse of recapitulationism is dead. Biologists riddled it with bullets in the 19th century, and have periodically kicked it a few times to be sure. For Intelligent Design creationists to show up over a century later and flog the crumbling bones of a long extinguished horse and crow victory is awfully silly.

So how can you still find any vestiges of Haeckel's work in textbooks?

Continue reading "Return of the Son of the Bride of Haeckel" (on Pharyngula)

1 Comment

So how can you still find any vestiges of Haeckel’s work in textbooks?

But but but…

Doesn’t evolution predict vestiges? ;)

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by PZ Myers published on June 1, 2007 10:42 AM.

Gonzalez, Textbooks, and Research was the previous entry in this blog.

Ole Fashioned Southern California Creationism is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Author Archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.381

Site Meter