Jars to Stars


NASA photo.

This article is so far off task that I thought of defining a new category, Way the Hell Off Topic, to complement Slightly Off Topic. But I want to alert anyone who may be interested in the publication of a new book, From Jars to the Stars, by Todd Neff, a book about Ball Aerospace and how they came to shoot a projectile at a comet – and hit it.

Neff, a former science reporter for the Boulder Daily Camera, has crafted a book that follows the fortunes of Ball Aerospace from before its inception until they managed to strike the comet Tempel 1 on July 4, 2005. As Neff describes it, hitting that comet was a bit harder than hitting a bullet in flight, because the comet itself has no fixed orbit, but rather is buffeted significantly by the evaporation of gases as it approaches the sun.

I may have been interested in the book partly because Ball is located just around the corner, in Boulder, Colorado, and I have met a few of the protagonists, though not as many as I had expected. But the book has more than parochial interest, because it describes in microcosm the growth of the space industry from its beginning, in this case, in the rocket lab at the University of Colorado in 1951, to the successful completion of the Deep Impact probe, which struck the comet with a projectile and also detected the resulting explosion with spectrometers and other instruments.

Neff’s book is a good blend of science and technology, organization and management, and biography. As far as I can tell, he gets virtually all the science right and presents it clearly, and I thought he included just enough biographical detail to make the protagonists human. The most remarkable thing about the project, though, is the false starts, the changes of direction, and the seemingly superhuman effort put in by some of the protagonists.

I did not find the first few chapters about the rocket lab very compelling, however, possibly because the book does not begin with a proper introduction and I had no clear idea where Neff was heading. Following advice I once got from a well-known author, I persevered until I got to page 70, by which time I was deeply engrossed in the book. The book itself is fairly well designed, though the index would have been better if some of the longer entries had been divided into several subentries (and also if they had skipped a line between letters of the alphabet). The book is also generally well edited, but it is marred by a handful of misspellings, such as Fritz Zernicke for Frits Zernike.


Wait, Ball Aerospace is [i]that[/i] Ball? What a jarring revelation!

who cares if it isn’t biology related?

it’s still cool.

and this:

As far as I can tell, he gets virtually all the science right

should get as much publicity as possible given how badly most journalists fubar science these days.

I think that comet/asteroid chemistry is not “OT” at all. For example;

Blank, J.G., Gregory H. Miller, Michael J. Ahrens, Randall E. Winans 2001 “Experimental shock chemistry of aqueous amino acid solutions and the cometary delivery of prebiotic compounds” Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 31(1-2):15-51, Feb-Apr

Chyba, Christopher F., Paul J. Thomas, Leigh Brookshaw, Carl Sagan 1990 “Cometary Delivery of Organic Molecules to the Early Earth” Science Vol. 249:366-373

Dworkin, Jason P., David W. Deamer, Scott A. Sandford, and Louis J. Allamandola 2001 “Self-assembling amphiphilic molecules: Synthesis in simulated interstellar/precometary ices” PNAS 98: 815-819

Cooper, George, Novelle Kimmich, Warren Belisle, Josh Sarinana, Katrina Brabham, Laurence Garrel 2001 “Carbonaceous meteorites as a source of sugar-related organic compounds for the early Earth” Nature 414, 879 - 883 (20 Dec 2001) Letters to Nature

Chronin, John R., Sandra Pizzarello 1997 “Entantiomeric Excesses in Meteoritic Amino Acids” Science Vol. 275:951-955

Deamer, D. W. 1985. Boundary structures are formed by organic components of the Murchison carbonaceous chondrite. Nature 317:792-7

Deamer, D. W., and Pashley, R. M. 1989. Amphiphilic components of carbonaceous meteorites. Orig. Life Evol. Biosphere 19:21-33.

Wait, Ball Aerospace is [i]that[/i] Ball?

Yes. And if you want to know why they are called Mason jars, despite the Ball logo, read the book.

I think that comet/asteroid chemistry is not “OT” at all.

Sorry. You are right. I am a physicist. I compartmentalize.

Oh yeah, I’m interested in this – Ball’s activities are familiar to any spacenik, a history of such an obscure topic would be interesting.

NASA’s been inquiring about setting up a facility here in Loveland CO, one of the motives being proximity to Ball in Boulder and some other space-related activities in the region.

Matt Young said:

I think that comet/asteroid chemistry is not “OT” at all.

Sorry. You are right. I am a physicist. I compartmentalize.

An extension of separability. :-)

An extension of separability. :-)

Is that one of those emergent properties? :)

Henry J said:

An extension of separability. :-)

Is that one of those emergent properties? :)


Yeah; like the proliferation of baby universes from a “mama” universe.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Matt Young published on January 1, 2011 9:12 PM.

Synthese Reminder: Two days left was the previous entry in this blog.

Are they fossils of Ediacaran metazoa? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.



Author Archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.361

Site Meter