Evolution: Education and Outreach – the new journal aspiring to promote accurate understanding and comprehensive teaching of evolutionary theory for a wide audience – will be freely available through December 31, 2011, thanks to the generosity of its publisher, Springer.
Evolution: Education and Outreach free in December
Categories:
8 Comments
About this Entry
This page contains a single entry by Richard B. Hoppe published on November 25, 2011 4:26 PM.
Lynn Margulis dies was the previous entry in this blog.
Tabanus subsimilis is the next entry in this blog.
Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.
Categories
- Announcements (16)
- Assault on Science (465)
- Bathroom Wall (13)
- Book Reviews (73)
- Conferences (25)
- Darwin's Finches (2)
- Designoids (9)
- Education and Legal (161)
- Eugenics (3)
- Evolution (747)
- Evolution Education (26)
- Expelled (71)
- Flyers/Pamphlets (3)
- Humor (157)
- ID/Creationism (107)
- Icons (2)
- Journal Club (32)
- Legal Issues (131)
- Manufactroversy (15)
- Medicine and Evolution (22)
- Metatalk (98)
- MustRead (7)
- News Roundup (29)
- Origin of new genes and new information (4)
- Prebiotic Chemistry (8)
- Question of the Day (6)
- Question of the Moment
- Quote of the Day (14)
- Religion and Politics (16)
- Research News (62)
- Resources for Biologists (23)
- Shoptalk (29)
- Slightly Off Topic (92)
- Steve Steve (71)
- Sticky (3)
- Their Own Words (20)
- Theological Issues with Intelligent Design (12)
- War on Science (49)
- What motivates creationism (23)
Thanks. I do like reading NCSE-backed propaganda. I have actually submitted a couple of manuscripts to the journal, edited by Niles Eldredge, but they didn’t like them.
LOL. Because Springer, one of the largest international scientific publishers, with an annual turnover of over 800 million Euro, needs or cares about the backing of the NCSE.
I have published with Springer too:
http://www.springerlink.com/content[…]613177m34r1/
It isn’t that they didn’t “like” your submissions. The issue is that you’re writing fiction, and submitting it to the wrong publishers. Your submissions are, no doubt, unsuitable for use even as cage liner.
From the conclusion in Joe’s paper in J Bioeconomics:
“Natural selection’s greatest strength as an opportunistic force also exposes its limitation and weakness in facilitating change within living organisms.”
Hence extinction. The history of life is a story of short-term success and long-term failure. Evolution is perfectly reasonable as a natural process. As the outcome of intelligent design, it requires a monster in the role of ‘designer’.
I wonder how many of the reviewers of Joe’s paper understood what he was really writing about.
No more Atheistoclast comments here, please.
I would hope so! He is hopelessly delusional, if not outright insane!
This comment has been moved to The Bathroom Wall.
Update