Set your irony meter on max. Imagine if someone had pro-ID talking points from someplace like the Discovery Institute, but transposed them to Utah’s new proposal for “divine design” legislation in 2006. The result:
Some will argue that this is an inappropriate mixture of science and religion, but again, divine design does not purport to say who or what the designer was.
“Survival of the fittest theory,” The Spectrum (southern Utah)
Looks like another trip to the irony meter store for me…